Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)
V.A. Sakeena vs State Of Kerala cites

Sasidharan vs Reserve Bank Of India on 23 June, 1990

"18. xxxxxxxxxx. Such a reserve power to correct mistakes committed by itself has to be located in every public authority in the interests of justice and to avoid arbitrariness. It is not uncommon - in fact it is a human failing that errors are committed in the conduct of human affairs. Infallibility is not a human virtue, that being a quality attributable only to the Almighty. Such a power to correct apparent mistakes is therefore an absolute necessity and has to be found in every authority, even without a specific provision as was held by me earlier in my decision in Sasidharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1990 (2) KLT 573, paragraph, 7 relying on the decision in Karunakaran Nambiar V. Director of Public Instruction, 1966 KLT 290 and others".
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

The Nayagarh Co-Operative Central Bank ... vs Narayan Rath And Anr. on 27 April, 1976

In Nayagarh Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. and another Vs. Narayan Rath and another [1977 (3) SCC 576] the Apex Court upheld the appointment of the Secretary of a co-operative society on the ground that the Registrar of Co-operative Societies who was present in the meeting held on 25.5.1955 in which the Secretary was appointed had acquiesced in it and 13 years had passed thereafter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 49 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

P.V.Venugopalan Nambiar vs The Director Of Public Instruction on 21 February, 2007

"18. xxxxxxxxxx. Such a reserve power to correct mistakes committed by itself has to be located in every public authority in the interests of justice and to avoid arbitrariness. It is not uncommon - in fact it is a human failing that errors are committed in the conduct of human affairs. Infallibility is not a human virtue, that being a quality attributable only to the Almighty. Such a power to correct apparent mistakes is therefore an absolute necessity and has to be found in every authority, even without a specific provision as was held by me earlier in my decision in Sasidharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1990 (2) KLT 573, paragraph, 7 relying on the decision in Karunakaran Nambiar V. Director of Public Instruction, 1966 KLT 290 and others".
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - K Joseph - Full Document

R.Rajalakshmi vs State Of Kerala on 3 January, 2022

12. The learned counsel for the petitioner however contends, relying on the decisions of the Apex Court in Nayagarh Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. and another Vs. Narayan Rath and another [1977 (3) SCC 576], H.C.Putasway and Others Vs. Honourable Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, Bangalore and Others [AIR 1991 SC 295] and the decision of learned single Judge of this Court in Rajalakshmi Vs. State of Kerala [1992 (1) KLT 458] that as the respondents have acquiesced in the appointment of the petitioner and approved it and allowed her to continue in the post, they cannot, after she has served for more than a decade, throw her out of service on the ground that her initial appointment was not in order.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - P V Kunhikrishnan - Full Document
1