Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)
Eakhalakh Ahmad And 2 Ors vs State Of U.P. And Another on 27 August, 2020 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

The legal position on the issue of quashing of criminal proceedings is well-settled that the jurisdiction to quash a complaint, FIR or a charge-sheet should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases. However, where the allegations made in the FIR or the complaint and material on record even if taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused, the charge-sheet may be quashed in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. In well celebrated judgment reported in AIR 1992 SC 605 State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal, Supreme Court has carved out certain guidelines, wherein FIR or proceedings may be quashed but cautioned that the power to quash FIR or proceedings should be exercised sparingly and that too in the rarest of rare cases.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document

R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960

After considering arguments raised by the learned counsel for parties and perusing the impugned complaint and the materials in support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the applicants, on the basis of which the entire proceeding can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 15811 - J C Shah - Full Document
1