Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bunty vs State (G.N.C.T.) Of Delhi on 16 March, 2011
16. It has also been held in para 8 of judgment titled as Bunty vs. State
(G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011 by
Page 11 of 13
FIR No. 382/09 : State V/s Uttam & Anr. : PS Aman Vihar : DOD: 13.05.2015
the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied the
Appellant voluntarily without any use of force exercised by
him. It is not a case wherein he had taken the prosecutrix
after enticing her. Prosecutrix had travelled with the
accused to different places outside Delhi without raising
any alarm or complaining to fellow passengers that she had
been taken away by force. If a minor accompanies accused
voluntarily without any offer or allurement then offence
under Section 363 is not made out. ...."
Section 366 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 361 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Birad Mal Singhvi vs Anand Purohit on 2 August, 1988
In the case of Birdi Mal Singhavi vs.
Anand Purohit, 1988 Supp. SCC 601, it has been held that no
evidentiary value can be given to Date of Birth entry in absence of material
Page 10 of 13
FIR No. 382/09 : State V/s Uttam & Anr. : PS Aman Vihar : DOD: 13.05.2015
on which entry is made.