Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)

Union Of India vs Tarsem Singh on 19 September, 2019

In closing his arguments, the learned Senior counsel submits that, the refusal to grant ration money allowance to the writ petitioners by the respondents is highly discriminatory and arbitrary, and it is further submitted that, the relief sought by the writ petitioners is not hit by the principles of delay and laches, by placing reliance on the case of Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648, wherein, it has been held that, in cases of continuing wrong, a writ petition can be entertained despite delay.
Supreme Court of India Cites 80 - Cited by 3438 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Samir Chandra Kar vs The Union Of India on 15 September, 2017

8. The learned DSG then submits that similar prayers for benefits by other civilian staff of the Assam Rifles had been turned down by the High Court, in the case of Samir Chandra Kar vs. Union of India, reported in 2017 SCC OnLine Megh 319, wherein it has been held that, classification between combatised and non-combatised personnel, is a valid classification because of their separate job responsibilities.
Meghalaya High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1