Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.58 seconds)The Court-fees Act, 1870
Nihalu And Anr. vs Chandar And Ors. on 10 September, 1958
This is as much as the learned Judges held in Nihalu's case, AIR 1959 Punj 115. Apparently the plaintiffs will not be able to insist contrary to the claim of the other co-sharers to bring in property, to which their sale does not relate, for partition, because they must be held to the terms and conditions of the sale in their favour, they being purchasers not of a share of the joint land of the original three co-sharers, but only a share of a defined part of it, that is to say, Killa numbers of rectangles 6 and 13.
Mst. Charan Kaur vs Hari Singh And Anr. on 10 September, 1953
Another case that Has been relied upon fn this respect by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs has been Charan Kaur v. Hari Singh, AIR 1954 Punj 124. But in that case the learned Judge upon the evidence found that adverse possession as claimed had not been proved.
1