Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)Mr. B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd vs Nair Coal Services Ltd. & Ors on 31 October, 2006
66. We are also not shutting our eyes towards the new principles of judicial
review which are being developed; but the law as it stands now having regard to the
principles laid down in the aforementioned decisions may be summarized as under:
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979
45. This Court also finds it pertinent to take note of the observations of
the Supreme Court in the case of Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International
Airport Authority of India and Others reported in (1979) 3 SCC 489 wherein
the Supreme Court observed in unequivocal terms that the terms of the NIT
cannot be ignored as being redundant or superfluous. They must be given a
meaning and the necessary significance.
Municipal Corporation vs Bvg India Limited on 27 March, 2018
In this connection, if this Court now
takes note of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Municipal
Corporation, Ujjain (supra) and the principles laid down therein and applying
to the facts of the present case, it would be seen that when the bid
documents categorically made it clear to provide such information in terms
with Clause 4.3B of the ITB and that too by filing an affidavit and in the form
mentioned in Clause 1.4(b) of Section 3 of the Bid Document, the
Respondents upon coming to learn about such non-disclosure of the existing
commitments as well as not providing the certificate from the Engineer In-
charge along with the documents ought to have rejected the bid of the
Private Respondent in all the three packages.
1