Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)

State Of Nagaland vs Lipok Ao & Ors on 1 April, 2005

In State of Nagaland vs Lipokao and others, (2005) 3 SCC 752, Hon'ble the Supreme Court opined that proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for exercise of discretion by the Court in condoning the delay In D. Gopinathan Pillai vs State of Kerala and another, (2007) 2 SCC 322, Hon'ble the Supreme Court opined that when mandatory provision is not complied and the delay is not properly, satisfactorily and convincingly explained, the Court cannot condone the delay on sympathetic ground only.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 1149 - A Pasayat - Full Document

D. Gopinathan Pillai ... vs State Of Kerala & Anr. ... on 15 January, 2007

In State of Nagaland vs Lipokao and others, (2005) 3 SCC 752, Hon'ble the Supreme Court opined that proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for exercise of discretion by the Court in condoning the delay In D. Gopinathan Pillai vs State of Kerala and another, (2007) 2 SCC 322, Hon'ble the Supreme Court opined that when mandatory provision is not complied and the delay is not properly, satisfactorily and convincingly explained, the Court cannot condone the delay on sympathetic ground only.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 238 - Full Document
1