Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)
State vs Pramod Kumar S/O Jagdish, on 21 October, 2011 cites

Jaskaran Singh vs State Of Punjab on 23 September, 1992

40.Having given careful consideration to the statements of PW1, PW2 and PW5, it is revealed that all these witnesses have not supported the prosecution case on any count. None of the public witnesses have deposed any word against the accused even PW1 and PW5 victims had denied to identified the accused as culprit who has done unnatural offence with them. PW5 and PW1 have not made any allegation against the accused for causing injury to him. This part of testimony of this material witness goes to the root of this case and cause to believe that these contradictions form the part of major contradictions. Since none of the public witnesses in their testimony pointed out towards the accused for commission of crime. Hence, these witnesses cannot be said to be reliable for prosecution. PW3, PW4 and PW6 are formal witnesses being official witnesses. On the point of major contradictions the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case titled as 'Jaskaran Singh Vs State 1997 SCC (Crl) 651' has also observed the following facts that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 154 - G N Ray - Full Document
1