Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)
State Of U.P. Thru. ... vs Ram Vinod Maurya & Anr. (Inre 3694 S/S ... on 20 August, 2019 cites

State Of U.P.Throu Secy.Secondary ... vs Ramayan Singh And Ors. 4393(S/S)2010 on 23 July, 2014

In view of the aforesaid subsequent development, so also the fact that the order dated 22.05.2015 passed in Writ-A No. 3636 of 2005 has been set aside and the matter has been remitted to the learned Writ Court to decide the writ petition afresh, therefore, we set aside the impugned Judgement and Order dated 31.08.2015, the writ petition is restored to its original number and the matter is remitted to the learned Writ Court to decide the same afresh in the light of observations made in order dated 19.07.2017 passed in Special Appeal No. 476 of 2016 (State of U.P. and others Vs. Ramayan Singh and 14 others) and connected appeal.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 9 - A P Sahi - Full Document

Jagdish Narayan Doharey vs State Of U.P. And Others on 22 May, 2015

It will be seen that the learned Single Judge has solely relied upon the judgement of the writ court in Jagdish Narayan Doharey (Supra). It is admitted between the parties that the judgment in the case of Jagdish Narayan Dohrey proceeded on a concession made on behalf of the parties including the State of U.P. in respect of the employees of police department only. Such concession had not been made in respect of the employees of other departments including the Horticulture Department where the writ petitioners/respondents were admittedly working.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 11 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Vinod Kumar Maurya vs State Of U.P. & Ors. on 9 July, 2010

This special appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 has been filed against the Judgement and Order dated 31.08.2015 passed by the learned Writ Court in Service Single No 3694 of 2002 ( Ram Vinod Maurya Vs. State of U.P. and others), whereby the learned Writ Court relying upon the order dated 22.05.2015 passed in Writ-A No. 3636 of 2005 has observed that there is no reason as to why not be the same benefits be not extended to the writ-petitioners, therefore, disposed of the writ petition filed by the writ-petitioner in terms of the order dated 22.05.2015 and directed the respondents to proceed as per time schedule indicated in the judgement dated 22.05.2015.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - S Kumar - Full Document
1