Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.18 seconds)
Ajay Verma vs State on 10 February, 2009 cites

Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Andhra ... on 6 December, 1977

8. Finally, it was urged that the petitioner has been in custody for more than five months after facing custodial interrogation from 1st September, 2008 till 6th September, 2008, during which period the petitioner fully cooperated with the investigation. Charge-sheet has since been filed and there is no reason to deny bail to the petitioner. The petitioner's only son is suffering from thalasimia, a life threatening disease in which twice in a month blood transfusion has to be given. If the petitioner is denied bail, his family will be seriously affected as there is no other male member in his family to look after his son. There is also no likelihood of the petitioner absconding as the petitioner did not misuse the interim bail granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 04.04.2008 and surrendered before the trial court in compliance with the order dated 26th August, 2008 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Crl.) 1791/2008. Reliance is sought to be placed upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of State BAIL APPLN. 2016/2008 Page No. 9 of 14 of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs. Balchand alias Baliay reported in 1977 (4) SCC 308 and Gudikanti Narasimhulu vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. reported in 1978 (1) SCC 240 to urge that the basic rule is to grant bail except where there are circumstances suggestive of fleeing from justice or thwarting the course of justice or creating other troubles in the shape of repeating offences, or intimidating witnesses and the like.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 3112 - V R Iyer - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs Balchand @ Baliay on 20 September, 1977

8. Finally, it was urged that the petitioner has been in custody for more than five months after facing custodial interrogation from 1st September, 2008 till 6th September, 2008, during which period the petitioner fully cooperated with the investigation. Charge-sheet has since been filed and there is no reason to deny bail to the petitioner. The petitioner's only son is suffering from thalasimia, a life threatening disease in which twice in a month blood transfusion has to be given. If the petitioner is denied bail, his family will be seriously affected as there is no other male member in his family to look after his son. There is also no likelihood of the petitioner absconding as the petitioner did not misuse the interim bail granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 04.04.2008 and surrendered before the trial court in compliance with the order dated 26th August, 2008 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Crl.) 1791/2008. Reliance is sought to be placed upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of State BAIL APPLN. 2016/2008 Page No. 9 of 14 of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs. Balchand alias Baliay reported in 1977 (4) SCC 308 and Gudikanti Narasimhulu vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. reported in 1978 (1) SCC 240 to urge that the basic rule is to grant bail except where there are circumstances suggestive of fleeing from justice or thwarting the course of justice or creating other troubles in the shape of repeating offences, or intimidating witnesses and the like.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 3729 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1