Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.59 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 145 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 261 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
In Rangappa Vs Sri Mohan, reported in
2010 (2) MWN (cr) DCC 5 (SC), a Three Judges Bench of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the failure to
reply to the statutory notice would lead to the
inference that there was merit in the complainant's
version. Since the signature of the cheque was not
disputed the statutory presumption comes into play
and when the accused failed to raise the probable
defence and rebut the presumption, the accused cannot
take advantage.
Anbarasu vs Mukanchand Bothra (Deceased) on 17 June, 2019
21.This Court in Anbarasu Vs Mukanchand
Bothra, reported in 2019 (3) MWN (Cr) DCC 1(Mad) held
that while exercising the revisional powers under
Section 397 r/w 401 CrPC, the Court is required to
find out if there is any illegality or impropriety in
the findings of the trial Court and the appellate
Court warranting interference and it is not open to
this Court to exercise the revisional power as second
appellate forum.
Ambica Quarry Works & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 11 December, 1986
29.It is useful to refer to the decision of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ambica Quarry Works Vs
State of Gujarat and others, reported in (1987) 1
SCC 213, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held
as follows: