Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.25 seconds)Section 161 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 162 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Pooja Pal vs Union Of India And Ors on 22 January, 2016
In Pooja Pal vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in
(2016) 3 SCC 135, it has been held:
Karnel Singh vs The State Of M.P on 11 August, 1995
59. Referring to its earlier decision in
Karnel Singh v. State of M.P. (1995) 5 SCC
518, it was reiterated that in a case of a
defective investigation, the court has to be
circumspect in evaluating the evidence and
may have to adopt an active and analytical
role to ensure that truth is found by having
recourse to Section 311 of the Code or at a
later stage also resorting to Section 391
instead of throwing hands in the air in
despair.
Ram Bihari Yadav vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 21 April, 1998
It recalled as well its observations in
Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar (1998) 4
SCC 517 that the courts are installed for
justice-oriented mission and thus, if a
negligent investigation or omissions or lapses
due to perfunctory investigation are not
effectively rectified, the faith and confidence of
the people would be shaken in the law-
enforcing agency and also in the institution
devised for administration of justice.
State Of Nct Delhi vs Shiv Kumar Yadav on 20 March, 2015
In State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Shiv Kumar Yadav &
Another reported in (2016) 2 SCC 402, it has been held: