Jalesar Sahu vs Raj Mangal And Ors. on 27 April, 1921
The finding of the Court clearly shows that this plot was neither let nor held for agricultural purposes, but that it was let for the planting of a grove and a grove exists on it and it is incapable of cultivation. The plot, therefore, is neither land within the meaning of the Act nor a holding. There can, therefore, be no bar to the transferability of the rights of the defendants. Vide the case of Jalesar Sahu v. Raj Mangal 63 Ind. Cas. 437 : 19 A.L.J. 616 : 43 A. 606. The finding of the Court below that, under the circumstances, the rights are tranferable cannot be impugned.