Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.32 seconds)Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shobha Rani vs Madhukar Reddi on 12 November, 1987
22. " About the changing perception of cruelty
in matrimonial cases, this Court observed in
Shobha Rani v. Madhukar Reddi at AIR p. 123,
para 5 of the report: (SCC p.108, para 5)
"5. It will be necessary to bear in mind
that there has been (a) marked change in
the life around us. In matrimonial duties
and responsibilities in particular, we find
a sea change. They are of varying degrees
from house to house or person to person.
Lachman Utamchand Kiriplani vs Meena Alias Mota on 14 August, 1963
21. Their Lordships of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
rt
Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani versus Meena alias
Mota, AIR 1964 SC 40 have held that in its essence desertion
means the intentional permanent forsaking and
abandonment of one spouse by the other without that other's
consent and without reasonable cause. It is a total
repudiation of the obligations of marriage. Their Lordships
have further held that the burden of proving desertion - the
'factum' as well as the 'animus deserendi' is on the petitioner
and he or she has to establish beyond reasonable doubt to
the satisfaction of the Court, the desertion throughout the
entire period of two years before the petition as well as that
such desertion was without just cause. Their Lordships have
held as under:
Bipin Chander Jaisinghbhai Shah vs Prabhawati on 19 October, 1956
In the judgment of this
Court in Bipin Chandra v. Prabhavati, 1956 SCR 838;
Rohini Kumari vs Narendra Singh on 2 December, 1971
22. Their Lordships of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Smt.
rt
Rohini Kumari versus Narendra Singh, AIR 1972 SC 459
have explained the expression 'desertion' to mean the
desertion of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage
without reasonable cause and without the consent or against
the wish of such party and includes the willful neglect of the
petitioner by the other party to the marriage.
The Bombay University Act, 1974
Parveen Mehta vs Inderjit Mehta on 11 July, 2002
In Praveen Mehta v. Inderjit Mehta, AIR
2002 SC 2582 it has been held that mental
.