Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 88 (0.42 seconds)Section 10A in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 11A in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shyam Sunder And Others vs Ram Kumar And Another on 30 July, 2001
31. The MMDR Amendment Act 2021 has to be
interpreted keeping in view the principles laid down by
the Supreme Court in Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar
and Suhas H. Pophale v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Girdhari Lal & Sons vs Balbir Nath Mathur & Ors on 26 February, 1986
(vi) As held by the Apex Court in the case of Giridari
Lal vs. Balbir Nath Mathur49, any interpretation /
construction of a provision that would lead to anomalies,
injustice or absurdity should not be adopted and the
interpretation that would advance the object of the
provision should be given effect to. In this context, it has to
be stated that the proviso to Section 10A(2)(b) inserted in
2021 cannot be interpreted in such a narrow or restricted
manner so as to wipe out or nullify all cases where the
lease deeds have not been executed in favour of the
prospecting licence holders who had applied for grant of
47
(2016) 6 SCC 209
48
(2020) 8 SCC 12
49
(1986) 2 SCC 237
South Gujarat Roofing Tiles ... vs State Of Gujarat And Another on 20 October, 1976
In South Gujarat Roofing Tiles Manufacturers
Association and Anr. vs State of Gujarat & Anr.,54 the
Supreme Court while considering explanation to entry 22
to Schedule of Minimum Wages Act and considering the
context in which it was used arrived at the findings that
54
(1976) 4 SCC 601