Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.45 seconds)
Shri.Kishor Tulshiram Mantri vs Mr.Dilip Janak Mantri on 10 October, 2018 cites

Board Of Control For Cricket, India & Anr vs Netaji Cricket Club & Ors on 10 January, 2005

3] To substantiate this submission, learned counsel for the Petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) & Anr. Vs. Netaji Cricket Club & Ors., (2005) 4 SCC 741, wherein it was held that the review can be allowed if there is sufficient reason to do so and what constitutes "sufficient reason", would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 381 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Lalla Singh Chouhan And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 8 ... on 1 February, 2018

4] Learned counsel for Review Petitioner has also relied upon the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta, in the case of Tinkari Sen 2/4 ::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 16/10/2018 23:35:07 ::: osk 79-rpsst-26121-2018.odt and Ors. Vs. Dulal Chandra Das and Ors., MANU/WB/0122/1967, wherein it was held that, "even if the mistake is on the part of the counsel and it has crept in by reason of an oversight on the part of Court, that will also be subject for review and it can be allowed on that ground".
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 141 - Full Document
1