Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.25 seconds)
M/S. A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. .. ... vs State Of Kerala & Ors. .. Respondents on 14 December, 2006 cites

Hitech Electrothermics & Hydropower ... vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 17 December, 2002

Evidently, except in a situation as might have been existing in Hitech Electrothermics (supra) that any application filed by the entrepreneur had not been processed within a reasonable time, in which case benefit might not be denied on equitable ground; in cases where there has been a substantial failure on the part of the industrial unit to obtain such benefit owing to acts of omission and commission on its part, in our opinion, no such benefit can be given.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial ... vs Dharnendra Trading Company, Etc. Etc on 5 May, 1988

Yet again in Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Asst.) Dharwar & Ors. vs. Dharmendra Trading Company & Ors. [(1988) 3 SCC 570], this Court, on the factual matrix obtaining therein, rejected the contention of the State that any misuse of the concessions granted was committed by the respondent therein and thus the State cannot go back on its promise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 107 - M H Kania - Full Document

Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 2 August, 1991

Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors. [1992 Supp (1) SCC 21] is a case where this Court had the occasion to consider as to whether subsequent change in the eligibility criteria can undo the eligibility for the condition stipulated in the earlier notification and answered the same in the negative.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 270 - S C Agrawal - Full Document
1   2 3 Next