Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.57 seconds)Section 22 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
G. T. Lad & Ors vs Chemicals & Fibres Of India Ltd on 6 December, 1978
43. The law regarding the abandonment of services by an employee
and how it is to be inferred is explained by Hon'ble Supreme Court
in case titled as G.T. Lad v. Chemical and Fibres of India Ltd.,
(1979) 1 SCC 590 wherein Court observed as follows.
M/S. Scooters India Ltd vs M. Mohammad Yaqub & Anr on 21 November, 2000
(xiv) M/s. Scooters India Ltd. vs. M. Mohammad Yaqub
2001 LLR 54, Supreme Court of India;
Deepali Gundu Surwase vs Kranti Junior Adhyapak & Ors on 12 August, 2013
54. The workman in this case has prayed for reinstatement and
back wages with all consequential benefits. It was argued during
final arguments that the claimant was working with the management
as a Clerk/Cashier and her last drawn wages were Rs.34,699/ per
month at the time of termination of employment. The AR for the
claimant has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble supreme court
tittled as Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak
Mahavidyalaya, (2013) 10 SCC 324 to press for the relief of
reinstatement and full back wages. It is further argued that in para
LIR No. 2539/19 Manisha Sehgal vs. M/s. Jain Co-operative Bank Ltd..
Section 26 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 239 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule vs Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank ... on 5 May, 2020
(i) Pandurang Ganpati Chaugale v. Vishwasrao Patil
Murgud Sahakari Bank Ltd., 2020 SCC Online SC 431;
M/S.Hindustan Unilever Ltd vs The Presiding Officer on 25 September, 2019
(iii) M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs. The Presiding
Officer (W.P. No. 33610 of 2013) decided on 25.09.2019;