Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.33 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
K. Jagannathan vs A.M. Vasudevan Chettiar And 12 Others on 25 January, 2001
(b) In 2001 (2) CTC 641 (K.Jagannathan V. A.M.Vasudevan Chettiar and 12
others), the Division Bench of this Court has held that "a minor member of Hindu
Joint family has been made eo-nominee party to partition deed, representing by
his natural guardian, minor filed a suit for partition ignoring earlier
partition deed, such Suit is not maintainable, since he has not sought for the
relief of setting aside such document."
M/S. Grasim Industries Ltd. And Anr vs M/S. Agarwal Steel on 20 October, 2009
(c) In 2010 1 Supreme Court Cases 83 (Grasim Industries Limited and
another Vs. Agarwal Steel), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that "when a person
signs a document, presumption is that he has read the document properly and
understood it and only then affixed his signatures thereon, unless there is
proof of force or fraud. Such presumption is much stronger in case of
businessmen.
Inum Beevi vs K.S. Syed Ahamed Kabir (Died) And 15 ... on 17 November, 2000
(d) In 2002 - 2 - L.W.357 (Inum Beevi Vs. K.S.Syed Ahamed Kabir (died) and
others), this Court has held that "once the respondent has admitted the
execution, it is not necessary for appellant to prove the same."
1