Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)
Union Of India vs Jai Parkash Gupta on 13 May, 2014 cites

Dev Dutt vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 May, 2008

In our opinion, the view taken in Dev Dutt v. Union of India & Ors., (2008) 8 SCC 725, that every entry in ACR of a public servant must be communicated to him/her within a reasonable period is legally sound and helps in achieving threefold objectives. First, the communication of every entry in the ACR to a public servant helps him/her to work harder and achieve more that helps him in improving his work and give better results. Second and equally important, on being made aware of the entry in the ACR, the public servant may feel dissatisfied with the same. Communication of the entry enables him/her to make representation for upgradation of the remarks entered in the ACR. Third, communication of every entry in the ACR brings transparency in recording the remarks relating to a public servant and the system becomes more conforming to the principles of natural justice. We, accordingly, hold that every entry in ACR--poor, fair, average, good or very good--must be communicated to him/her within a reasonable period.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 1116 - M Katju - Full Document
1