Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 183 (0.69 seconds)The Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986
Article 163 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 166 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Commissions Of Inquiry Act, 1952
Article 143 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
N.Kannadasan vs Ajoy Khose & Ors on 6 May, 2009
13.11 Reference
was made to the decision in the case of N.Kannadasan (supra) to
submit that it was a case where the question of appointment of
President of the Consumer Commission was involved. The Consumer
Forum is exercising judicial powers, the ratio laid down by the Apex
Court in such a case would not apply in the present case.
Section 10 in The Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Justice K.P. Mohapatra vs Sri Ram Chandra Nayak And Others on 9 October, 2002
The
Allahabad High Court's judgment has relied upon the decision of this
Court in Chandra Mohan's case (AIR 1966 SC 1987) (supra) for the
purpose of holding that it is only the hierarchy of ordinary civil
Courts in the narrow sense headed by a District Judge which comes
under the term "judicial service" under Article 236. The
view taken by the Allahabad High Court appears to be too narrow a
view of the term "judicial service". In Chandra Mohan's
case (supra), this Court was primarily concerned with excluding from
judicial service persons who held posts in services which were not
exclusively judicial. When the service is exclusively judicial, there
is no reason to exclude such judicial service from that term under
Article 236. The High Court in the present case is justified in
rejecting the narrow view taken in that judgment.