Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Hiten P. Dalal vs Bratindranath Banerjee on 11 July, 2001
Same was held by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in Hiten P. Dalal v. Bratindranath Banerjee [(2001) 6 SCC
16].
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
14. In the present case, the accused has admitted in the notice under Section 251
Cr.P.C. that the cheque in question bears his signatures and he issued the same in
favour of the complainant. Reference can be made to judgment of Apex Court in
Rangappa v. Mohan, [AIR 2010 SC 1898] that,
"Once the cheque relates to the account of the accused and he accepts and
admits the signatures on the said cheque, then initial presumption as contemplated
under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has to be raised by the Court in
favour of the complainant."