Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)Prem Thakur vs State Of Punjab on 17 November, 1982
In Prem Thakur v. State of Punjab, [AIR 1983 SC 61], whereupon Mr.
Aggarwal has placed strong reliance, the links of the chain were not
complete, although the prosecution case rested on circumstantial evidence.
In that case, five persons were murdered, the pattern involved in the
commission of the crime belied the conclusion that Appellant therein had
any hand in it. This Court disagreed with the findings of the High Court that
Appellant therein was present with the deceased person on the evening of
November 8 and he had been missing from there from the next morning;
which was the only circumstance which had led the High Court to conclude
that Appellant was guilty of commission of the offence beyond any shadow
of doubt. The circumstances upon which the High Court relied were
considered by this Court to be hazardous to base conviction.
State Of Rajasthan vs Smt. Kamla on 11 October, 1990
In State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Kamla [AIR 1991 SC 967], this Court
again on the fact situation obtaining therein did not base its judgment of
conviction on the circumstantial evidence laid therein.
The Identification Of Prisoners Act, 1920
Section 276 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1