Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)
Banoth Gopal And 2 Others vs B.Janardhan Reddy on 4 December, 2020 cites

Tayabbhai M. Bagasarwalla & Another vs Hind Rubber Industries Private Limited ... on 19 February, 1997

26. The Supreme Court in Tayabbhai M. Bagasarwalla v. Hind Rubber Industries (P) Ltd.1 approved the principle in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Hadkinson v. Hadkinson2 that a party, who knows of an order, whether null or valid, regular or irregular, cannot be permitted to disobey it; and they cannot themselves judge whether an order was null or valid - whether it was regular or irregular. It held that they should come to the court and not take upon themselves to determine such a question. The following statement of law in the said decision was quoted by the Supreme Court:
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 239 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Ch. Narayana Reddy, vs Sri. D. Krishna Bhaskar on 20 August, 2019

Learned counsel for the petitioners had contended that it is not a compliance as per the orders passed by this Court since the respondents have deliberately rejected thee case of thee petitioners and therefore they are liable for punishment under Contempt of Courts Act. He relied upon the judgement of this Court in Ch. Narayana Reddy v. D.Krishna Bhaskar1, wherein, this Court in para No.26, held as follows:
Telangana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - M S Rao - Full Document
1