Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan vs The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 April, 2022
The Hon?ble Supreme Court in the case of Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2022 SCC OnLine SC 513 in para nos.16, 17 and 18 has held as under:-
Satish Kumar Jatav vs State Of U.P. on 17 May, 2022
Hon?ble Supreme Court in the case of Satish Kumar Jatav vs. State of U.P., 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 488 has held that the ground that ?no useful purpose will be served by prolonging the proceedings of the case? cannot be a good ground and/or a ground at all to quash the criminal proceedings when a clear case was made out for the offence alleged.
Ramveer Upadhyay vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 20 April, 2022
Likewise in Ramveer Upadhyay vs. State of U.P., AIR 2022 SC 2044 the Hon?ble Supreme Court held that the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not to be exercised for asking. In exercise of power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the Court does not examine the correctness of the allegations in a complaint/F.I.R. except in exceptionally rare cases where it is patently clear that the allegations are frivolous or do not disclose any offence. Entertaining a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. at an interlocutory stage itself might ultimately result in miscarriage of justice.
Aman Preet Singh vs Republic Of India (Cbi) .... Opposite ... on 9 July, 2021
It is made clear that the in case, it is observed by learned trial Court that the present appellant has extended cooperation in getting the investigation concluded, in that eventuality learned trial Court shall also consider the application for bail moved by him in the light of law laid down in Aman Preet Singh v. C.B.I., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 941.
State Of U.P. And 2 Others vs Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan on 8 May, 2015
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the entire proceedings of criminal case No.85306 of 2022, State vs. Surya Pratap Singh, arising out of FIR No.0190/2020, under Section 66 Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, Police Station Mahanagar, District Lucknow.
Section 66 in The Information Technology Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
In State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the Hon?ble Supreme Court in paragraph no.102 has held as under:-
1