Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Capt. D.N. Badoni on 14 May, 2013 cites

Mani Square Limited vs Vinita Agrawal on 21 October, 2009

6. In our view, the purpose of eliciting required information from the Branch Manager of the insurance company shall be equally served even by filing interrogatories, to be answered by him and hence there was no need for the District Forum to have summoned the Branch Manager of the insurance company for cross-examination. Learned counsel for the revisionist pressed into service the decision of the Hon'ble National Commission in the case of Mani Square Limited and others Vs. Vinita Agrawal and others; I (2010) CPJ 150 (NC), wherein it was held that the purpose of eliciting required information from witness shall be equally served even by filing interrogatories, to be answered by the witness and the revision petition was dismissed.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Institute Of Laparoscopic Surgery, ... vs Bimal Kumar Ghosh on 30 May, 2007

Learned counsel for the revisionist cited another decision of the Hon'ble National Commission rendered in the case of Institute of 3 Laparoscopic Surgery, Jeevan Satya and another Vs. Bimal Kumar Ghosh; I (2008) CPJ 470 (NC). In the said case, the permission for cross-examination of witness was declined and the application was dismissed by the State Commission. The interrogatories for purpose of cross-examination were served by the opposite party and the same were replied by witness. It was held by the Hon'ble National Commission that no interference is required in the impugned order and the revision petition was dismissed.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1