Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.31 seconds)

Arumughachamy Nadar vs Deivanaiammal on 11 February, 1998

7. The decision relied on by the learned Counsel for the revision petitioners/plaintiffs in Arumughachamy Nadar v. Deivanaiammal reported in 1998 (2) MLJ page 5 deals with a mortgage deed for the value of of Rs. 40,000/= sought to be relied on by a tenant as against the landlord in the said case. In the said circumstance this Court held that the document which is compulsorily registrable cannot be admitted in evidence for any purpose under Section 49 of the Act. But there is a proviso to that section which enables to look into document for any collateral purpose. If the petitioner wants to prove his possession as a mortgagee, then that cannot be treated as a collateral purpose coming under the proviso to Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1