Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Mohan vs Kanagavalli on 1 July, 2014
60.In Mohan v. Kanagavalli, (2014) 6 CTC 677, a single bench of this Court referred to Section 7-A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 introduced by the Tamil Nadu Act 21 of 1967.
V. Shankar Ram vs Mrs. Sukanya on 11 March, 1997
In V Sankar Ram versus Mrs Sukanya 1997-2 law weekly 371 it was held that a party cannot plead voidability of marriage merely because the parties cannot live together for any domestic reasons.
Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 1 February, 1965
In Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 1564 : (1965) 2 Cri LJ 544, the Court referred to Mulla's Hindu Law, 12th Edn., at p. 605 about Gandaharva marriage, It quoted The Gandharva marriage is the voluntary union of a youth and a damsel which springs from desire and sensual inclination. It has at times been erroneously described as an euphemism for concubinage. This view is based on a total misconception of the leading texts of the Smritis. It may be noted that the essential marriage ceremonies are as much a requisite part of this form of marriage as of any other unless it is shown that some modification of those ceremonies has been introduced by custom in any particular community or caste.At p. 615 itis stated:
Section 19 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Tamil Nadu Registration of Marriages Act, 2009
S.Balakrishnan Pandiyan vs The Superintendent Of Police on 17 October, 2014
62. A Division Bench of this Honble Court has however, in S.BalakrishnanPandiyan Vs. Superindentent of Police, 2014 (6) CTC 129, while dealing with a batch of habeas corpus case considered the scope of marriage solemnized in law offices and law chambers by lawyer-cum-priest and requisition of such marriages under the provision of the Tamil Nadu Registration of Marriage Act 2009.
A.Asuvathaman vs Union Of India on 30 October, 2015
57. Introduction of Section 7A to the Act was in the background of social changes that swept the stake of Tamil nadu and Union Territory of Pondicherry. The challenge to same was dismissed by this Court in A.Asuvathaman vs. Union of India and another 2015 SCC Online Mad 9765.
V.Parthasarathy vs Bhuvaneshwari @ Bommi on 22 June, 2018
85. The Division Bench of this Court in V.Raja versus Bhuvaneshwari 1997-3 Law weekly 613 dismissed the case on the ground of limitation.
1