Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Gurcharan Singh vs State Of Punjab on 10 August, 1962
In GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF
PUNJAB reported in (2017) 1 SCC 433, the Hon'ble
Apex Court at para 27 of its Judgment was pleased to
refer to its another previous case (Randhir Singh Vs.
State of Punjab - (2004) 3 SCC 129) and to observe as
follows:
Kasinathan, Velayutham And Arjunan vs State, Represented By Inspector Of ... on 19 September, 2005
In the case on hand when the above
principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court is
applied, firstly it could be seen that even according to
all the material prosecution witnesses since about not
less than four to six years the appellant/accused was,
apart from subjecting his wife to cruelty, was also
abusing her in filthy language and asking her to die.
Though none of the witnesses have given any specific
incident as to under what circumstances or with what
intention the accused is alleged to have uttered those
words 'go and die', as such, the mere uttering of the
words 'go and die' in the course of alleged abusing of
his wife by itself in the circumstances of the present
case, cannot be considered as the accused having any
intention or illwill to instigate his wife to make her to
commit suicide.
State Of W.B vs Orilal Jaiswal on 23 September, 1993
In State of W.B. v. Orilal Jaiswal, this
Court has observed that the courts should be
extremely careful in assessing the facts and
circumstances of each case and the evidence
adduced in the trial for the purpose of finding
whether the cruelty meted out to the victim
Crl.A.No.262/2014
62
had in fact induced her to end the life by
committing suicide. If it transpires to the court
that a victim committing suicide was hyper-
sensitive to ordinary petulance, discord and
differences in domestic life quite common to
the society to which the victim belonged and
such petulance, discord and differences were
not expected to induce a similarly
circumstanced individual in a given society to
commit suicide, the conscience of the court
should not be satisfied for basing a finding that
the accused charged of abetting the offence of
suicide should be found guilty."
Randhir Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 12 October, 2004
In GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF
PUNJAB reported in (2017) 1 SCC 433, the Hon'ble
Apex Court at para 27 of its Judgment was pleased to
refer to its another previous case (Randhir Singh Vs.
State of Punjab - (2004) 3 SCC 129) and to observe as
follows: