Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Section 4 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time ... vs S.K. Roy, The Chairman, Life Insurance ... on 9 August, 2016
FACTS
The Appellant vide her RTI application sought information regarding the modus operandi in
pursuance with the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Tamil Nadu Terminated Full
Time Temporary Employees Association vs. LIC of India in respect of workers who had worked
temporarily with LIC and their absorption in permanent vacancies, whether there was any time
frame adopted for giving appointment, etc.
The CPIO, vide its letter dated 09.06.2017, informed the Appellant that the process was ongoing
and that seeking an opinion did not fall within the purview of the definition of "information" as
per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005. Dissatisfied with the response of the CPIO, the Appellant
Page 1 of 6
approached the FAA. The FAA, vide its order dated 07.07.2017, while concurring with the
response of the CPIO provided additional clarifications in the matter to the Appellant.
HEARING:
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In this context a reference was made to the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in 2011 (8) SCC
497 (CBSE Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay), wherein it was held as under:
General Manager Finance Air India Ltd & ... vs Virender Singh on 16 July, 2012
Furthermore, High Court of Delhi in the decision of General Manager Finance Air India Ltd &
Anr v. Virender Singh, LPA No. 205/2012, Decided On: 16.07.2012 had held as under:
1