Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)Ram Briksh Singh & Ors vs Ambika Yadav & Anr on 9 March, 2004
" In embarking upon the minutest re-examination of the whole evidence
at the revisional stage, the learned Judge of the High Court was totally
oblivious of the self-restraint that he was required to exercise in a
revision under Section 397 Cr. PC. On behalf of the accused, reliance is
placed on the decision of this Court to which one of us (Justice
Sabharwal) is a party i.e. Ram Briksh Singh v. Ambika Yadav. That was
the case in which the High Court interfered in revision because material
evidence was overlooked by the Courts below."
Section 397 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
1