Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.51 seconds)Kalu Ram Ahuja & Anr vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr on 25 August, 2008
" 5. Undisputedly, DDA had taken a conscious decision to
auction the plot. It is neither the pleaded case of the
respondents nor has any material been produced before this
Court to show that the said decision was taken by the
competent authority under some misapprehension. It is also
not in dispute that the appellants participated in the auction
held on 21.06.1988, and gave the highest bid, which, as
mentioned above, was rejected by the Vice-Chairman, DDA.
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
6. Learned counsel Mr.Paras Jain also relied upon the
observations of the Apex Court in Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief
Election Commissioner {(1978) 1 SCC 405} as quoted in East
Coast Railway and another v. Mahadev Appa Rao and
others {(2010) 7 SCC 678}.
East Coast Railway & Anr vs Mahadev Appa Rao & Ors on 7 July, 2010
6. Learned counsel Mr.Paras Jain also relied upon the
observations of the Apex Court in Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief
Election Commissioner {(1978) 1 SCC 405} as quoted in East
Coast Railway and another v. Mahadev Appa Rao and
others {(2010) 7 SCC 678}.
Kerala Financial Corporation vs Vincent Paul & Anr on 14 March, 2011
7. Per contra, learned counsel Mr.Gururaj Joshi appearing
for the respondent submitted that the auction sale was
cancelled for bona fide reasons and in public interest, in so far
as the minimum upset price required to be fixed was found to
be below the appropriate level and experts' opinion were
obtained in that regard before proceeding to re-auction the
-8-
properties. He relied upon the specific observations recently
made by the Apex Court in Kerala Financial Corporation v.
Vincent Paul and another (AIR 2011 SC 1388) specifically
in the context of Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations
Act, even as in the facts of that case, a decree of specific
performance was already made and upheld by the High Court,
the Apex Court inter alia observed:
1