cites: 1841413

1 - 10 of 15 (0.20 seconds)

Mohd. Ibrahim And Anr. vs Mohd. Yusuf And Anr. on 1 May, 2007 cites

Section 41 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1092

Section 20 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2735

Parakunnan Veetill Joseph'S Son Mathew vs Nedumbara Kuruvila'S Son And Ors. on 14 September, 1987

In P.V. Joseph's (supra), the Supreme Court observed:

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 172 - Full Document

Ganesh Shet vs Dr. C.S.G.K. Setty & Ors on 15 May, 1998

In Ganesh Shet (supra), the Supreme Court had examined the principles of law applicable to suits of specific performance in regard to the discretion which is to be exercised under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act when there is a conflict between the pleading and the evidence and in this context observed that while normally It is permissible to grant relief on the basis of what emerges from the evidence even if not pleaded provided there is no prejudice to the opposite party, but such a principle cannot be applied in suits relating to specific performance.

Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 87 - M J Rao - Full Document