Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.32 seconds)
Appasab Patil S/O Late Basawantrao ... vs The State Of Karnataka Ors on 12 February, 2015 cites

G. Bassi Reddy vs International Crops Research Instt. & ... on 14 February, 2003

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G. BASSI REDDY v. INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ANOTHER reported in (2003)4 SCC 55 225 at paragraph 28 of the judgement has held that "A writ under Article 226 can lie against a "person" if it is a statutory body or performs a public function or discharges a public or statutory duty (Praga Tools Corpn. V. C.A. Imanual, Sri Anadi Mukta Sadguru Trust V. V.R. Rudani SCC at p.698 and VST Industries Ltd. V. Workers' Union). ICRISAT has not been set up by a statute nor are its activities statutorily controlled. Although, it is not easy to define what a public function or public duty is, it can reasonably be said that such functions are similar to or closely related to those performable by the State in its sovereign capacity."
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 103 - R Pal - Full Document

Praga Tools Corporation vs Shri C. A. Imanual & Ors on 19 February, 1969

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G. BASSI REDDY v. INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ANOTHER reported in (2003)4 SCC 55 225 at paragraph 28 of the judgement has held that "A writ under Article 226 can lie against a "person" if it is a statutory body or performs a public function or discharges a public or statutory duty (Praga Tools Corpn. V. C.A. Imanual, Sri Anadi Mukta Sadguru Trust V. V.R. Rudani SCC at p.698 and VST Industries Ltd. V. Workers' Union). ICRISAT has not been set up by a statute nor are its activities statutorily controlled. Although, it is not easy to define what a public function or public duty is, it can reasonably be said that such functions are similar to or closely related to those performable by the State in its sovereign capacity."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 756 - J M Shelat - Full Document

Anandi Mukta Sadguru Shree Mukta ... vs V.R. Rudani & Ors on 21 April, 1989

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G. BASSI REDDY v. INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ANOTHER reported in (2003)4 SCC 55 225 at paragraph 28 of the judgement has held that "A writ under Article 226 can lie against a "person" if it is a statutory body or performs a public function or discharges a public or statutory duty (Praga Tools Corpn. V. C.A. Imanual, Sri Anadi Mukta Sadguru Trust V. V.R. Rudani SCC at p.698 and VST Industries Ltd. V. Workers' Union). ICRISAT has not been set up by a statute nor are its activities statutorily controlled. Although, it is not easy to define what a public function or public duty is, it can reasonably be said that such functions are similar to or closely related to those performable by the State in its sovereign capacity."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 559 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Vst Industries Ltd vs Vst Industries Workers Union & Anr on 7 December, 2000

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G. BASSI REDDY v. INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ANOTHER reported in (2003)4 SCC 55 225 at paragraph 28 of the judgement has held that "A writ under Article 226 can lie against a "person" if it is a statutory body or performs a public function or discharges a public or statutory duty (Praga Tools Corpn. V. C.A. Imanual, Sri Anadi Mukta Sadguru Trust V. V.R. Rudani SCC at p.698 and VST Industries Ltd. V. Workers' Union). ICRISAT has not been set up by a statute nor are its activities statutorily controlled. Although, it is not easy to define what a public function or public duty is, it can reasonably be said that such functions are similar to or closely related to those performable by the State in its sovereign capacity."
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 124 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next