Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)
Mewa Singh Pattar vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 29 April, 2015 cites

Ghanshyam Dass Relhan vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 16 July, 2009

3. Learned State counsel contended that the pension on resignation is admissible on completion of thirty years of service and in special cases after completion of 25 years of service. He further contended that service in this case is even less than ten years, so the petitioner is not entitled to any pension on resignation. He refers to the judgment Ghanshyam Dass Relhan Vs. State of Haryana and ors. passed in Special Leave Petition (C) No.98 of 2007 decided on 16.07.2009.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 34 - A Kabir - Full Document

M.M. Lal Bareja vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 5 January, 1995

"A similar issue as regards the entitlement of an employee to be paid pension in lieu of the service rendered with the Govt. of Haryana prior to joining the service of the National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. i.e. a Govt. of India Undertaking came up for consideration before this Court in case of M.M. Lal Bareja Vs. State of Haryana, 1995 (2) S.C.T 178. While examining such issue in the light of Rules 3.17 and 4.19 (b) contained in Chapter III of the Punjab Civil Service Rules (Vol. II) as applicable to the State of Haryana, it was held that pension is payable even to such an employee who was holding a temporary post under the State Govt. and who may have subsequently resigned from the previous post in order to join another service under the Central or the State Govt. It was further held that the rules contemplate the grant of pension to a person who has resigned from service in order to take up another appointment and such resignation is not to be treated as resignation from public service."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1