Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.28 seconds)
The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd vs The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Iron & ... on 9 February, 2018
cites
Section 3 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972
Section 5 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Indramani Pyerelal Gupta And Ors. vs W.R. Natu And Ors. on 1 March, 1956
(emphasis added)
In the case of Indramani Pyarelal Gupta(supra) relied upon by
the State, in paragraph 26, the Apex Court held thus:
R. Dalmia vs C.I.T., Delhi, New Delhi on 21 September, 1977
By relying upon a decision of the Apex Court in the case of
R. Dalmia Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (supra), the learned
Government Pleader urged that the impugned amending Act is not
arbitrary or unreasonable. He urged that the State has power to amend
the bye-laws for levy of fees with retrospective effect. He submitted that
power to manage includes power to levy fees for management of the
market areas. If the bye-laws were silent about the power to collect
certain fees from the earlier date, the Validating Act has made good the
lacuna in the said bye-laws.
Section 8 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Utkal Contractors & Joinery Private ... vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 7 May, 1987
It will be necessary
to make a reference to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of
Utkal Contractors & Joinery (P) Ltd. and Ors. Vs. State of Orissa (supra).
Paragraph 14 of the said decision reads thus :-
Kewal Krishan Puri & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Others on 4 May, 1979
In paragraph 23 of the decision of the Apex
Court in the case of Kewal Krishan Puri vs. State of Punjab and Ors., the
law on this aspect has been laid down which reads thus :-
Shri Prithvi Cotton Mills Ltd. & Anr vs Broach Borough Municipality & Ors on 25 April, 1969
(emphasis added)
In the case of Shri Prithvi Mills Ltd (supra), the Apex Court
held thus: