Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.24 seconds)Linder Frank Wolfgang vs Yogesh D.Shah & Anr on 11 September, 2001
Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mc Dowell and Company Ltd. (supra), judgment in the case of Under Frank Wolfgang (supra) and also the Book of New Jurisprudence by D.A. Upponi in this behalf. In my view, none of the contentions raised by the petitioner requires to be accepted. The authorities have led the evidence and gave findings and therefore it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to say that this case is of no evidence.
Section 31 in The Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977 [Entire Act]
Mcdowell And Company Limited vs Commercial Tax Officer, Nacharam ... on 14 March, 1996
Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mc Dowell and Company Ltd. (supra), judgment in the case of Under Frank Wolfgang (supra) and also the Book of New Jurisprudence by D.A. Upponi in this behalf. In my view, none of the contentions raised by the petitioner requires to be accepted. The authorities have led the evidence and gave findings and therefore it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to say that this case is of no evidence.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977 [Entire Act]
Siddharth Mohanlal Sharma vs South Gujarat University on 23 October, 1981
5. I have gone through the record of the case. I have also gone through the findings of all the three authorities and the record of the case and also the contention of the petitioner and also the Judgment of this Court in the case of Siddharth Mohanlal Sharma (supra). I have also considered the three orders passed by the authority, affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the Government, provisions of the Entertainment Tax and the Rule.