Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)Raman vs State Of Kerala on 20 August, 2008
9. Further, in the decision reported in Raman Vs.
State of Kerala [2007 (4) KLT 223], this court has held
that even inter state transport of a contraband article will
amount to transport mentioned in Section 55(a) of the Abkari
Act. So, under the circumstances, the lower court was
perfectly justified in coming to the conclusion that the
prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the
accused had transported the Foreign Liquor manufactured in
Karnataka and he was not having any document in his
possession to prove that it is a licit liquor entitled to be
possessed by him in Kerala and thereby, he had committed the
offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act and
rightly convicted him for the said offence. I don't find any
reason to interfere with the finding of the court below on this
aspect.
Section 232 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1