Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.23 seconds)

State Of Haryana vs Ranbir Alias Rana on 5 April, 2006

15. But this pronouncement of apex court do not help appellant because in this case Shivdayal (PW-5) Clearly deposed that he informed appellant that "if you wish you may be searched in the presence of Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate". In this regard his statement also corroborated from Ex.P/8. This is the substantial compliance with the requirement of Section 50. Even otherwise opium was not recovered from the personal possession of appellant. The opium was seized from the bag hanging on the shoulder of the appellant, in that circumstances provisions of Section 50 does not applicable in the case. Apex court in the case of State of Haryana v. Ranbir alias Rana, (2006) 5 SCC 167., State of H.P. v. Pawan kumar, (2005) 4 SCC 350, State of Haryana v. Ranbir alias Rana, (2006) 5 SCC 167.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 140 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next