Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Pawan Kumar on 8 April, 2005

6. HC Vijender Singh (PW­3) has proved the proceedings conducted by him on the spot alongwith IO/SI Ashish Kumar and Ct. Ramesh. They noticed a bus bearing registration No. DL­1PA­4384 and a TSR bearing No. DL­1RC­4639 in accidental condition. By then, the injured persons were shifted to HRH by PCR. Thereafter, he alongwith SI Ashish went to HRH after leaving Ct. Ramesh at spot and collected MLCs of the injured persons. Case was registered, site plan was prepared. Both the vehicles were seized vide seizure memo as Ex.PW3/A & Ex.PW3/B, driving license of injured/ deceased Rehmat Ali was taken into possession vide memo Ex.PW3/C, insurance of TSR was taken into police possession vide memo Ex.PW3/D. Post mortem over the bodies of Rahmat Ali and Varsha were got conducted. Notice u/s. 133 of M.V. Act was served upon the owner of the offending vehicle namely Sh. Pranav Kumar, in compliance thereof, he produced the bus. Thereafter, the accused was arrested and personally searched vide memos Ex.PW3/E & Ex.PW3/F. The RC and insurance certificate of the offending vehicle i.e. bus was taken into police possession vide memo Ex.PW3/G & Ex.PW3/H. The driving license of accused was also taken Page No. 3 State Vs. Pawan Kumar FIR No. 367/00, U/s : 279/337/338/304 A, PS Model Town into possession vide memo Ex.PW3/J. Both the vehicles were got mechanically inspected. The spot was got photographed from different angles. The photographs of the TSR and offending bus are collectively Ex.P1 to Ex.P­7. This witness was not cross­examined by Ld. Defence counsel despite giving an opportunity in this regard.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 489 - G P Mathur - Full Document
1   2 Next