Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.30 seconds)

U.P. State Mineral Development ... vs Vijay Kumar Upadhayay & Anr. Etc on 17 January, 1997

3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Vijay Narayan Upadhyay with the prayer to allow this application and to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 01.09.2021 and impugned cognizance order dated 31.03.2022 along with non bailable warrant dated 23.02.2023 as well as entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No. 3534 of 2022 (State Vs. Vijay Kumar Upadhyay) arising out of case crime no. 85 of 2021, under Section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Police Station Chauri, District Bhadohi, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi and with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case, during the pendency of the present application.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Bhaskar Laxman Jadhav & Ors vs Karamveer Kakasaheb Wagh Edu.Sty.& Ors on 11 December, 2012

7. This is viewed as a concealment of a relevant and a vital fact from the Court. The Apex Court in the case of Bhaskar Laxman Jadhav & Others vs Karamveer Kakasaheb Wagh Education Society and others : (2013) 11 SCC 531 has held that a litigant who comes to the Court has to approach the Court with clean hands. He cannot choose what to disclose and what not to disclose, he has to disclose all the relevant facts and circumstances from the Court. The Apex Court has even held that a passing reference of a fact is not a disclosure. The disclosure has to be full and in specific terms.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 145 - M B Lokur - Full Document
1