Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.68 seconds)

Hira Singh And Another vs Union Of India And on 13 September, 2018

15. Even though, hence dis­concurrent/divergent views are expressed by this Court, and, by a co­ordinate Bench of this Court, vis­a­vis, the conundrum hence besetting both the Courts, (a) yet this Court is constrained not to refer the afore conundrum, for, an adjudication thereon being rendered, by a larger Bench of this Court, as (b) the Hon'ble Apex Court while making a decision in Hira Singh's case (supra), has, hence thereunder made a reference to a larger bench, of the Hon'ble Apex Court, vis­a­vis, the conundrum besetting this Court (c) thereupon when verdicts of the Hon'ble Apex Court are binding upon this Court, (d) thereupon, for avoiding emanation, of, an earlier thereto conflicting rendition by a larger Bench of this Court, vis­a­vis the verdict as may come, from, the larger Bench, of, the Hon'ble Apex Court, upon a reference made qua ::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2019 22:04:30 :::HCHP 29 it in Hira Singh's case (supra), also, thereupto it would be insagacious or unbefitting, to rest, the validity of conflicting verdicts recorded by co­ordinate Benches of this Court, by .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Mohd.Sahabuddin & Anr vs State Of Assam on 5 October, 2012

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also placed reliance, upon, a judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, rendered, in a case titled, as, Mohd. Sahabuddin and another vs. State of Assam, reported in (2012) 13 SCC 491, ::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2019 22:04:30 :::HCHP 7 relevant paragraph(s) No.11 and 12 whereof, stand extracted hereinafter:­ "11. The submission of the learned counsel for the .
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 80 - Full Document
1   2 Next