Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.19 seconds)
Hare Ram Kesari vs Roshan Lal Page 1 Of 17 on 25 January, 2019 cites

Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. vs Jaibir Singh & Ors. on 21 December, 2009

In view of the directions contained in order dated 18.01.2018 of Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha in FAO no. 842/2003 titled as Rajesh Tyagi vs Jaibir Singh, the statement of petitioner was also recorded wherein he had stated that petitioner was entitled to exemption from deduction of TDS and that he would submit form 15G to the insurance co. so that no TDS is deducted.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 3383 - J R Midha - Full Document

M.C.D vs Asscn.,Victims Of Uphaar Tragedy & Ors on 13 October, 2011

7. Dis­figuration/deformity Rs. 50,000/­ Total Rs. 3,36,448/­ Rounded of to Rs. 3,37,000/­ ( Rupees Three Lakhs Thirty Seven Thousand only) The claimant/petitioner is also entitled to interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of DAR i.e. w.e.f 11.05.2016 till realisation of the compensation amount. The said interest @ 9% p.a. was awarded on the award amount by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy, 2012 ACJ 48 (SC) .
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1848 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs Susamma Thomas on 6 January, 1993

11. Statement of petitioner in terms of clause 29 MCTAP was recorded. I have heard the petitioner and ld. counsel for the petitioner/claimant regarding financial needs of the injured/petitioner and in view of the judgment in the case of General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Susamma Thomas & Others, 1994 (2) SC, 1631, for appropriate investments to safeguard the amount from being frittered away by the beneficiaries owing to their ignorance, illiteracy and being susceptible to exploitation, following arrangements are hereby ordered:­ Further, an amount of Rs. 50,000/­ be released to petitioner in cash in his saving bank a/c no. 757502010006443 with Union Bank of India, Hare Ram Kesari vs Roshan Lal Page 12 of 17 Hare Ram Kesari vs Roshan Lal Page 13 of 17 Rani SAkarpura branch, Bihar i.e. the branch near his place of residence as mentioned in his statement recorded under clause 27 MCTAP with necessary endorsement regarding no cheque book and debit card in terms of orders of Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha in FAO No. 842/2013 dated 15.12.2017 and 18.01.2018 and remaining amount be kept in 24 FDRs of equal amount for a period of one month to 24 months respectively with cumulative interest without the facility of advance, loan and premature withdrawal without the prior permission of the Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 4294 - G N Ray - Full Document
1