Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)
Sambit Ray vs State Of Odisha & Ors. .... Opposite ... on 4 September, 2023 cites

Ajit Kumar Barik And Others vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 15 December, 2021

4.1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that thereafter, when Petitioner was directed to provide the medical unfit certificate of his mother, the same was also provided after the Petitioner's mother was declared unfit by the CDMO, Cuttack on 06.10.2015. Even though, everything was complied with, but O.P. No. 1 rejected the claim of the Petitioner vide the impugned communication dtd.08.10.2016 under Annexure-13 on the ground that the spouse of the deceased employee was eligible to make the application and the Petitioner as the 2nd legal heir is not eligible. It is also submitted that the grounds on which the claim of the Petitioner was rejected is no more res integra in view of the decision of this Court reported in the case of Ajit Kumar Barik Vs. State of Odisha & Ors. (2018 (II) OLR P-10).
Orissa High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 11 - B R Sarangi - Full Document

Kalia Sethi And Another vs State Of Odisha And Others on 9 August, 2017

6.1. In view of such steps taken in the matter, the claim of the Petitioner should not have been rejected. In any view of the matter, this Court finds that the Petitioner's claim has been illegally rejected and accordingly this Court is inclined to quash the said rejection available at Annexure-13 so far as it relates to the Petitioner. While quashing the same, this Court directs the O.P. No. 1 to take appropriate step in the matter and take a fresh decision in Page 3 of 4 // 4 // accordance with the Rule prevalent at the time of death of the deceased employee by following the decision in the case of Malayananda Sethi Vs. State of Odisha & Ors.. Such a fresh decision shall be taken within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of this order.
Orissa High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 11 - S N Prasad - Full Document
1