Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.39 seconds)State Of Madhya Pradesh & Anr vs Dharam Bir on 8 June, 1998
4.6 Learned Additional Advocate General relied
on the decision of the Supreme Court in State of
Madhya Pradesh v. Dharam Bir [(1998) 6 SCC 165], in
particular paragraphs 32, 33 and 34 thereof, to
submit that experience is a condition of eligibility
and could not be equated with the educational
qualifications. When the plea of experience cannot
stand against the provisions of the Rule, it must
fail, held the Supreme Court.
Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Kaila Kumar Paliwal & Anr on 2 May, 2007
Again by pressing into service, decision of
the Supreme Court, in Rajasthan Public Service
Commission v. Kaila Kumar Paliwal [(2007) 10 SCC
260], it was submitted that when the post of Head
Page 10 of 14
Downloaded on : Sun Jun 30 16:16:49 IST 2019
C/SCA/21486/2017 CAV JUDGMENT
Master was governed by separate Rules statutory in
nature, eligibility has to be determined with
reference to such Rules.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in Orissa Education Act, 1969 [Entire Act]
Orissa Education Act, 1969
The Amending Act, 1897
M/S Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills vs Commnr. Of Central Excise & Anr on 24 November, 2015
4.2 On the basis of all the above aspects,
learned senior counsel for the petitioners contended
that the petitioners-Teachers working in the grant-
in-aid schools ought to have been treated as a one
class for the purpose of the post of Principal. It
was submitted that the State Government could not
have decided one single class of Teachers into two
classes and thereby render the petitioners ineligible
for the post of Principal in the registered private
grant-in-aid secondary and higher secondary schools.
By pressing into service the decision of the Supreme
Court in Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v.
Commissioner of Central Excise [(2016) 3 SCC 643,
paragraphs 28 and 29], it was submitted by learned
senior advocate for the petitioners that Rules or
Regulations framed under the delegated powers under
the statute cannot cross the limits of the statutory
provisions.