Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.50 seconds)Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Devendra Swaroop Saksena vs Union Of India Through Its Secretary on 19 December, 2014
In the case of Devendra Swaroop Saxena Vs. Union of
India & Ors. in OA No 4258/2013 decided on 19.12.2014,
the objects of recording confidential ACR have been dealt
with in Para 18 of the order, which is being reproduced as
hereunder:-
Amar Kant Choudhary vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 3 January, 1984
(ix) The Apex Court in Amar Kant Chaudhary and
Yamuna Shankar Misras case has emphasized the need
for sharing information before forming an adverse
opinion. The Apex court in Amar Kant Choudhary had
asked the Executive to re-examine the existing practice
Page 16 of 25
17 O.As.Nos200/00171,177,334 & 335/2018
of writing of ACRs to find a solution to the misuse of
these powers by officers, who may not be well
disposed.
State Of Haryana vs Shri P.C. Wadhwa, Ips Inspector General ... on 16 April, 1987
18. Additionally, we have consulted decisions of the Apex
Court in Amar Kant Chaudhary versus State of Bihar [AIR
1984 (SC) 531]; State of Haryana versus P.C. Wadhwa
[AIR 1987 (SC) 1201]; Union of India versus E.G.
Nambudiri [AIR 1991 (SC) 1216]; S. Ramachandra Raju
versus State of Orissa [1994 (5) SLR 199]; Sri Rajasekhar
versus State of Karnataka [1996 (5) SLR 643]; State Bank
of India versus Kashinath Kher [AIR 1996 (SC) 1328];
Union Of India & Ors vs E.G. Nambudiri on 23 April, 1991
18. Additionally, we have consulted decisions of the Apex
Court in Amar Kant Chaudhary versus State of Bihar [AIR
1984 (SC) 531]; State of Haryana versus P.C. Wadhwa
[AIR 1987 (SC) 1201]; Union of India versus E.G.
Nambudiri [AIR 1991 (SC) 1216]; S. Ramachandra Raju
versus State of Orissa [1994 (5) SLR 199]; Sri Rajasekhar
versus State of Karnataka [1996 (5) SLR 643]; State Bank
of India versus Kashinath Kher [AIR 1996 (SC) 1328];
S. Ramachandra Raju vs State Of Orissa on 31 August, 1994
18. Additionally, we have consulted decisions of the Apex
Court in Amar Kant Chaudhary versus State of Bihar [AIR
1984 (SC) 531]; State of Haryana versus P.C. Wadhwa
[AIR 1987 (SC) 1201]; Union of India versus E.G.
Nambudiri [AIR 1991 (SC) 1216]; S. Ramachandra Raju
versus State of Orissa [1994 (5) SLR 199]; Sri Rajasekhar
versus State of Karnataka [1996 (5) SLR 643]; State Bank
of India versus Kashinath Kher [AIR 1996 (SC) 1328];
Sri M.A. Rajasekhar vs The State Of Karnataka & Anr on 16 August, 1996
18. Additionally, we have consulted decisions of the Apex
Court in Amar Kant Chaudhary versus State of Bihar [AIR
1984 (SC) 531]; State of Haryana versus P.C. Wadhwa
[AIR 1987 (SC) 1201]; Union of India versus E.G.
Nambudiri [AIR 1991 (SC) 1216]; S. Ramachandra Raju
versus State of Orissa [1994 (5) SLR 199]; Sri Rajasekhar
versus State of Karnataka [1996 (5) SLR 643]; State Bank
of India versus Kashinath Kher [AIR 1996 (SC) 1328];
State Bank Of India Etc vs Kashinath Kher & Ors. Etc on 8 February, 1996
18. Additionally, we have consulted decisions of the Apex
Court in Amar Kant Chaudhary versus State of Bihar [AIR
1984 (SC) 531]; State of Haryana versus P.C. Wadhwa
[AIR 1987 (SC) 1201]; Union of India versus E.G.
Nambudiri [AIR 1991 (SC) 1216]; S. Ramachandra Raju
versus State of Orissa [1994 (5) SLR 199]; Sri Rajasekhar
versus State of Karnataka [1996 (5) SLR 643]; State Bank
of India versus Kashinath Kher [AIR 1996 (SC) 1328];
State Of U.P. & Anr vs Ved Pal Singh & Anr on 7 October, 1996
State of U.P. versus Ved Pal Singh [AIR 1997 (SC) 608];
Swatantar Singh versus State of Haryana [AIR 1997 (SC)
2105]; Union of India versus N.R. Banerjee [1997 SCC
(L&S) 1194]; State of U.P. versus Yamuna Shanker Misra
[1997 (4) SCC 7]; State of Gujarat vesus Suryakant
Chunilal Shah [1999(1) SCC 529]; P.K. Shastri versus
State of M.P. & Ors.[1999(7) SCC 329], B.P. Singh versus
State of Bihar [2001 SCC (L&S) 403] and also the decision
of Ahmedabad Bench of this Tribunal in the matter of A.P.
Srivastava versus Union of India & Ors [OA No.673/2004
decided on 09.01.2007] on the basis of which following
principles could be culled out:-