Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.99 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 140 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 357 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
V. Muralidharan vs V.A. Kumaran on 5 July, 2016
In Muralidharan.V v. V.A.Kumaran and Another
reported in 2016(3)KHC 845, it has been discussed two
situations, which reads as follows:
M/S Laxmi Dyechem vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 27 November, 2012
38. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Laxmi Dyechem v. State of
Gujarat and others reported in (2012) 13 SCC 375 has held
that even when a cheque is returned for any other reasons
such as "account closed, payment stopped, refer to drawer,
signature does not match", etc., in each case Sec.138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act will be attracted and that
24 CC NO.11497/2007
insufficiency of funds as envisaged in Sec.138 of the NI Act is a
genus and dishonour for reason of "accounts closed",
"payment stopped", "referred to drawer,"etc are only species of
that genus, etc.
Nepc Micon Limited And Others vs Magma Leasing Limited on 29 April, 1999
In NEPC Micon Limited and Others v Magma Leasing
Limited,(1999) 4 SCC 253 it has been held by Hon'ble Apex
Court that: