Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.29 seconds)M/S Hyderabad Vanaspathi Limited vs Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board ... on 1 April, 1998
(2) SCC 125; Bihar State Electricity Board v. Parmeshwar 1994 (4) SCC 636 (vide para 16) and M/s Hyderabad Vanaspati Ltd. v. A.P. State Electricity Board (para 22).
Mrs. Madhu Garg And Anr. vs North Delhi Power Ltd. [Along With W.P. ... on 9 November, 2005
22. We agree with the learned Single Judge who has disposed of Writ Petition (C) No. 3532/2003 Ms. Madhu Garg v. North Delhi Power Ltd. by directing her to pay the dues for the electricity consumed by one Jathedar Richpal Singh. The learned Single Judge in paragraph 20 to 23 of his judgment has dealt with this petition in detail and we fully agree with the reasoning contained therein. The petitioner was well aware of the outstanding dues against Jathedar Richpal Singh even before she purchased the property from him. Page 1122 However, as already observed above, even if she was unaware she has to pay the outstanding dues.
Section 79 in The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Indian Electricity Act, 1910
Section 11 in The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd vs Gujarat Inns. Pvt. Ltd. And Ors on 16 March, 2004
6. The view taken in Isha Marbles (supra) was repeated by the Supreme Court in Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. v. Gujarat Inns Pvt. Ltd. .