Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs Workman, Indian Drugs & ... on 16 November, 2006
54.
Supreme Court in the case of Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals
Ltd. (supra) has held that whereas a permanent employee has a right to the
post, a temporary employee has no right to the post. There was no issue before
the Supreme Court in the said judgment as to the right of an employee who
belonged to an open category and was appointed in the reserved post for more
than 5 years with continuity of service when no candidate from reserved
category was available and whether such an employee could get benefit of the
government resolution dated 5th December 1994. In my view, the said judgment
of the Supreme Court thus would not assist the case of the petitioners.
Ramkrishna Chauhan vs Seth D. M. High School on 12 March, 2013
The principles of law laid down by the Full Bench in the case of Ramkrishna
Chauhan & Ors. (supra) squarely applies to the facts of this case. I am
respectfully bound by the said judgment. In my view, the finding rendered by
::: Uploaded on - 29/06/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 29/06/2016 23:59:55 :::
kvm
23/29
WP3433.02
the university tribunal that even for those small intermittent breaks from August
1992, service of the respondent no.1 will have to be held as a continuous service of
a permanent employee as a full-time lecturer in the subject statistics for all the
purposes is not perverse and does not warrant any interference by this Court.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977
Shri Krishna Dnyandeo Lad vs Chairman, Rahmatpur Panchkrushi ... on 11 January, 2008
In so far as the judgments of this Court in the
cases of Ramkrishna Chauhan & Ors. (supra) and Krishna Dnyandeo Lad
(supra) relied upon by the petitioners are concerned, in my view, the said
judgment would not assist the case of the petitioners but would assist the case of
the respondent no.1. Reliance placed on the said judgments by the petitioners is
::: Uploaded on - 29/06/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 29/06/2016 23:59:55 :::
kvm
24/29
WP3433.02
misplaced.
Kini Karyat Shikshan Mandal And Anr. vs Pramod Satuppa Oulkar And Ors. on 16 August, 2007
In my view, the judgment of
this Court in the case of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan & Anr. (supra) squarely
applies to the facts of this case. I am respectfully bound by the decision of this
Court in the said judgment.
1