Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)

Shail Kumari Devi & Anr vs Krishan Bhagwan Pathak @ Kishun B Pathak on 28 July, 2008

8. Mr. Verma submitted that in any case, the learned trial Judge was not justified in awarding maintenance from the date of the application. I do not find any merit in the submission of Mr. Verma. This question was considered by the Apex Court in Shail Kumari Devi Vs. Krishan Bhagwan Pathak, (2008) 9 SCC 632 and Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Vs. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas, (2015) 2 Supreme Court Cases 385.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 165 - C K Thakker - Full Document

Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas & Anr vs Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas & Anr on 19 November, 2014

8. Mr. Verma submitted that in any case, the learned trial Judge was not justified in awarding maintenance from the date of the application. I do not find any merit in the submission of Mr. Verma. This question was considered by the Apex Court in Shail Kumari Devi Vs. Krishan Bhagwan Pathak, (2008) 9 SCC 632 and Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Vs. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas, (2015) 2 Supreme Court Cases 385.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 93 - S A Bobde - Full Document
1